Streamline number of contents based on users’ needs
Partipost, 2023
Research
UI Design
User Interview
Usability Testing
UI Design
Product Manager
UX Writer
Full-Stack Engineers
• Enabled clients to manage their own campaigns
• Reduced registrations requiring assistance from 30% to 10%
Why do clients need the operational team’s assistance with registration reviews?

To support Partipost’s strategy of reducing the workload of the operations team, our team investigated their workflow.
We noticed that 30% of registrations require assistance from the operations team, which conflicts with the purpose of the registration feature. This feature is designed to allow clients to list their preferences for influencers—such as follower count or profile type—then have influencers complete the registration. Clients can then select those who match their brand image to complete tasks like posting content on social media.
To understand why clients require assistance with registration approval, the PM and I conducted user interviews with operations leads and clients from different countries.
Our assumption of users’ needs in reviewing registrations to help us draft the interview questions:
Research Questions:
By interviewing five operations leads and two clients, we found that clients aim to ensure every profile wishing to join their campaigns undergoes thorough scrutiny by their teams during the registration review process. However, the following pain points hinder clients from easily using our platform to review registrations independently and require significant effort from the operations team.

We see users struggle using our current filters, so we prioritize this feature to be improved.

At first, I attempted this version with minimal changes while ensuring UI consistency with the new design system.
However, during user testing, I observed that most users were unsure about which option to select inside the operator dropdown. As a result, users frequently skipped selecting an operator and instead directly chose a value to filter

Based on the observation in exploration 1, I noticed users only consider the value they want to be filtered in the table.
Therefore, I come up with this version and keep users’ focus on the values.
Objectives
Testing Plan
In each flow, we will assign users a task to complete and observe if they can reach the goal screen using the click map. Subsequently, we will ask users questions to validate the effectiveness of the design.
Questions we ask in survey

Sorting Flow
85% (30/35) of testers successfully reach the goal screen without additional user education

Filtering Flow
76% (16/21) of testers answered the new filter experience is easier to use compared with the existing one
(21 testers are the users answered they have used the existing filter in our platform)
Completing the entire flow
89% (31/35) of testers successfully reach the goal screen without additional user education
This improvement of registration achieve:
From a business perspective, we effectively reduce the amount of time the operations team needs to spend reviewing profiles and assisting clients in managing them.

By building a sorting feature, we meet users' need to easily select influencers from highest to lowest followers without exporting to Google Sheets.

After improving the filtering feature, users can now select multiple values from each category.

We are also introducing a marking feature to satisfy users' needs that could not be met with our platform before.
Now, users can mark profiles they find acceptable and use them as a backup plan when there are no new registrations but still empty slots.
